Google Seeks to dismiss US Antitrust Lawsuit over Android


An antitrust lawsuit focused on Google’s Android running device must be pushed aside, Google mentioned in a court filing on Friday, partly as a result of smartphone producers are free to utilize Android on their telephones without additionally putting in Google apps.

Two smartphone consumers filed a proposed class action lawsuit towards Google Inc. In could, arguing that the best way Google licenses Android to smartphone companies like Samsung Electronics Co Ltd is unfair to Google’s opponents for search and other cellular products and services.

The lawsuit is the newest antitrust difficulty confronting Google, which has faced complaints from rivals together with Microsoft Corp that it unfairly ranked its own services and products larger than opponents’ in search outcomes. A proposed settlement with European regulators on that problem is pending.

Within the U.S. lawsuit, plaintiff lawyers had argued that Google forces cellphone producers to set its personal search engine because the default on Android telephones. Google knows customers will not go in the course of the trouble of fixing those default settings, the lawsuit mentioned, placing rivals at an unfair disadvantage given Android’s world market share.

“Google badly desires default search engine status because it ends up in extra paid search-related commercials,” the lawsuit stated, “which are the source of most of its billions and billions of greenbacks in annual income.”


But in a filing on Friday in San Jose, California, federal court, Google argued that the U.S. classification motion will have to fail as a result of handset manufacturers are usually not obligated to simply accept Google apps as a precondition for the usage of Android.

Additionally, if a phone manufacturer does decide to install Google apps, they can still preload competing apps as neatly. Consumers, moreover, are free to customize their own phones and substitute Google search as the default.

“Google’s habits shouldn’t be handiest totally in keeping with however in truth promotes lawful competition,” the corporate wrote.

Google additionally argued that the lawsuit failed to point out how Google’s agreements with handset manufacturers brought about shoppers to overpay for his or her phones.

A lawyer for the plaintiffs may now not in an instant be reached for remark. A listening to on the motion to dismiss is currently scheduled for October.

The case in U.S. District courtroom, Northern District of California, is Gary Eielson and Daniel mckee, on behalf of themselves and all others in a similar way situated vs. Google Inc., 14-2007.

Comments are closed.