The controversy surrounding Freedom 251, the Rs. 251 telephone that captured the world’s interest, does not seem to be demise down. After Ringingbells, the Naiad-based totally maker of the telephone, in advance this week attempted to reassure customers through promising to refund the primary section’s 30,000 clients, now Acoma has issued a declaration to dissociate itself from the company.
In an emailed statement to gadgets 360, Santee Bhatia, Founder & Chairman, gain computers (Acoma), said the business enterprise had sold the handsets to Ringingbells at Rs. 3,600 consistent with handset, and did now not understand about the Naiad-based totally business enterprise’s plans to resell the devices.
To take into account, the business enterprise had showcased the Acoma Icon four smartphones to media round its launch ultimate month. Ringingbells had then clarified that the handset it distributed is simply an early prototype, and that the inner additives are particular. “Simplest the body and contact panel come from Acoma,” President Ashok Chatham told devices 360.
If Ado’s statement is to be believed, then this is virtually no longer the case. Within the meanwhile, any other smartphone maker brought on a few controversies this week. Kochi-based totally phone Electronics and technologies changed into due to release its ‘Mango cellphone’ or ‘phone’ variety of smartphones on Monday, however of the three brothers that helm the corporation have been reportedly rather arrested from the release venue due to pending financial institution fraud instances in opposition to them.
Right here is Santee Bhatia’s complete declaration reproduced in its entirety.
– “Touted to be the most important rip-off of the millennium, Freedom 251, had lately announced that it might give out 25 lakh handsets within the first segment earlier than June this 12 months. Ensued by way of such unrealistic charge quotes and naive pronouncements, the figure agency ‘Ringingbells’ become not simplest accused of jogging a disgraceful ploy, but has additionally relabelled our brand Acoma. To clear the air round, I would love to underline few records relating case, as this scam exhibits the capacity of maligning our emblem name Acoma that is our trademark seeing that 2001. Yes, it’s far authentic that, even though we bought the handsets to ‘Ringingbells’ in advance, like we sell Acoma mobiles to lakh of customers; we have been definitely ignorant of the reselling plans of the business enterprise in query. Furthermore, we still haven’t been capable of compare their pricing coverage, as we sold the handsets at Rs. Three, six hundred in keeping with unit. We are deeply grieved via this incident in which our mobile cellphone has been offered to hundreds for Rs. 251, and consequently, might now not hesitate from taking any felony movements in opposition to the corporation, in case the complete fiasco influences Ado’s logo call or subsequently we face every other type of losses. We’d also like to claim that Adcom is in no way linked or linked with Ringingbells or Freedom 251 and bears no obligation what so ever, inside the complete swindle and remorse the inconvenience brought on to our valued customers from all around the us of a.”